UK capacity market surprises again

The recent UK capacity auction was dominated by small scale peakers. But this may be an anomaly with the regulatory landscape shifting in favour of CCGTs.

January 9, 2017

The UK capacity market continues to deliver surprises.  Large scale CCGT plants were expected to provide most of the new capacity in the third T-4 auction held in December.  But small scale peaking generators again dominated the auction, driving down the clearing price to 22.50 £/kW, well below consensus expectations.

The evolution of the UK capacity market is being closely followed across Europe.  France and Italy are in the process of implementing similar market wide capacity mechanisms.  Other markets such as Germany and Belgium are exploring strategic reserve mechanisms to ensure support for flexible capacity.

Regardless of the capacity support mechanism, the UK experience is providing important information on capacity costs and the competitiveness of new technology types versus existing plants.  The UK capacity market is also helping to crystallise the commercial and financing models of new flexible generation projects and driving down costs. So what are the lessons from the UK auction to carry into 2017?

3rd auction highlights

Given quite a bit of detailed analysis on the auction has already been published, we keep this article focused on a few important headline facts.

Clearing price:

There was a broad range of published views on clearing price levels going into the auction.  Most of these were in the 35-45 £/kW range, based on estimates of the cost to deliver new CCGT capacity.  Instead, substantial volumes of smaller scale distribution connected capacity pushed prices below 25 £/kW.  The auction supply stack is shown in Chart 1.

Chart 1: 2016 T-4 auction supply stack

2018-t-4-auction-stack

Source: EMR delivery body

Unsuccessful capacity:

The volume of existing capacity that was unsuccessful in the auction was dominated by older coal units (Cottam, Fiddlers Ferry and 1 unit of West Burton A) and Peterhead, the Scottish CCGT disadvantaged by locational TNUoS charges.  No big surprises here.

The other key category of exiting capacity was the 8.5 GW of unsuccessful new build CCGT projects.   The developers backing these projects included ESB, Carlton Power, Calon (Macquarie), Scottish Power, SSE and Intergen.

Existing coal assets and new CCGTs likely dominated the large volumes of capacity that exited the auction between 30-35 £/kW and between 22.50-25 £/kW.

New build:

Small scale peakers once again dominated successful derated new build capacity which was split across:

  • 0.33 GW Centrica’s Kings Lynn CCGT
  • 0.30 GW Intergen’s Spalding expansion OCGT
  • 1.5 GW of small scale peakers (mostly gas or diesel reciprocating engines)
  • 1.4 GW unproven DSR (the majority of which is likely to be small scale engines behind the meter)
  • 0.5 GW of battery storage (including some volumes also successful in Grid’s Enhanced Frequency Response tender in Aug 2016)

You could easily conclude from these results that small scale peakers will continue to dominate capacity delivery going forward.  But in our view the result of 2016 T-4 auction may with hindsight be viewed as a bit of an anomaly.

Peakers and embedded benefits

The economics of small scale distribution-connected peakers have been attractive to date.  Reciprocating engines have ‘all in’ capex costs as low as 150-200 £/kW (vs 500+ £/kW for new CCGTs).  Peakers have also had access to revenue uplift from a range of other embedded generation benefits that we have described previously.

These factors have helped to drive down capacity bids to around the 20 £/kW level or even below.  But peaker developers are facing dark clouds building on the horizon.  There is a concerted government effort underway to ‘level the playing field’ between CCGTs and small peakers.  Action already underway includes:

  1. Ofgem review of embedded generation benefits, with specific focus on the most lucrative triad benefit (from helping suppliers reduce transmission charge burdens)
  2. UK government (BEIS) consultation on removing the ‘double counting’ of Capacity Market Supplier Charge avoidance revenue
  3. DEFRA consultation on imposing emissions limits that require diesel engines to fit emissions abatement equipment

In advance of the Dec 2016 auction, there was a lack of clarity on what changes will ultimately be made, and when. But Ofgem published a letter that provided strong guidance that it is minded to substantially reduce the triad benefit going forward (citing a 1-6 £/kW range versus the current 45 £/kW).

The ‘11th hour’ nature of Ofgem’s letter (only 4 days before the auction started) likely diluted its impact on auction bidding.  Capacity market bids tend to be signed off at board & investment committee level well in advance of the auction.  And it appears optimism prevailed in the way peaker developers bid capacity into the December auction.

Bidding optimism may have been driven by a belief that the government will grandfather existing projects, despite Ofgem providing guidance that this may cause problems.  But in the absence of grandfathering, the economics of small peakers is under threat, at least at 20 £/kW capacity bids.

New build CCGTs

All the excitement surrounding the success of peakers masked another important development from the 2016 auction process.  The bids from CCGT new build projects were significantly more competitive than in previous auctions.  We identify three important factors behind this:

  1. Turnkey contract terms: There have been genuine reductions in turbine capex costs and improvements in unit efficiencies and flexibility.
  2. Financing terms: Investor willingness to take on merchant risk has reduced project dependence on tolling contracts with steep price haircuts.
  3. Spark spreads: The 2016 recovery in spark spreads and CCGT load factors (at the expense of coal units) is increasing energy margin expectations

So while peakers won round three of the battle for 15 year new build agreements, CCGTs closed the competitive gap.  This is likely to be important going forward as peaker economics are eroded by the reduction and removal of embedded benefit revenue streams.

Implications for the future

Rightly or wrongly the government remains supportive of larger scale grid connected generation capacity, particularly new CCGTs, as the primary way to resolve the UK’s current security of supply issues. So ironically, a good result for small peakers in 2016 may undermine their prospects going forward.

The results of the 2016 auction will likely only encourage the UK government to take more aggressive action to curb embedded benefits going forward.  A set of scheduled policy announcements in 2017 will mean a clearer rule book going into next year’s T-4 auction.  And it is our view that the ‘levelled playing field’ will likely favour CCGT developers as the primary source of new capacity going forward.

Article written by Olly Spinks & David Stokes

 

Relevant Articles:

The UK’s battle for new capacity: peakers vs CCGTs

UK CCGT margins take off, coal plants bleed

Fixing the UK’s broken capacity market?